Pay for performance: Incentive Pay Benchmark

The median published figure in the Incentive Pay Benchmark is 3.60 percent across 2 sources' own pages (range 3.40 to 3.80 percent), read 12 October 2026.

Orgplanly sells its own paid plan in this category (our pricing). It is not counted here: every figure in this index is another provider's own published price, read from its own page.

3.6 % Median published figure unchanged since 26 Sept 2026 read 19 Oct 2026
3.4 to 3.8 % Range lowest to highest published figure
2 Sources with a figure of 7 read in full, 19 Oct 2026
2 of 7 Sources read that publish one 29% publish a figure at all
  1. ONS: Average weekly earnings in Great Britain (bulletin)3.8 %
  2. Statistics Canada: payroll employment, earnings and hours (The Daily)3.4 %
One figure per source, highest first.median 3.6 %
Table view
RowValue
ONS: Average weekly earnings in Great Britain (bulletin)3.8 %
Statistics Canada: payroll employment, earnings and hours (The Daily)3.4 %

2 of the 7 named sources read in full publish a figure; 5 publish none, read 12 October 2026.

The median is unchanged since 26 September 2026 (was 3.60 percent across 2).

By country

BreakdownMedianRangeSources
countryGB3.8%3.8 to 3.8%1
countryCA3.4%3.4 to 3.4%1

Every figure, with its source

One row per source: the figure the source's own page publishes, the page, and the day it was read. A figure that is not on a page we read is not on this one.

The sentence each figure was read from (2)

Read in full, publishes no figure

5 named sources were read in full on the dates shown and print no usable figure. They are counted, never filled in.

Methodology

Every row is a verbatim sentence read from the named source's own page through our fetch service on the date shown, hash-pinned to the stored read (the sha of the page's visible text; the raw page is mirrored to R2).

2 of the 7 named sources that could be read published a usable figure; 5 published none and are recorded as not published, never filled in; 0 could not be read (blocked, dead or unreachable) and count nowhere.

The headline figures (median, minimum, maximum, quartiles) are over ONE figure per source in % (a source's median where its page yielded several accepted sentences), so N counts sources, never sentences; 65 candidate sentence(s) were refused by a reviewer with the reason recorded.

The fuller derivation this dataset is chartered to grow into (not yet what the figures above are; they are each source's own published figure as read): the share of total employer compensation cost that is incentive or supplemental pay, per country, per industry and per occupation, from each national statistical agency's own release, beside the bonus component of earnings growth; the series across releases is the figure (how the bonus share moves with the cycle), and the cross-country comparison is the second; every number is quoted with its reference period and its table number

65 candidate sentences on these pages were refused by a reviewer; each refusal and its reason is recorded in the review ledger.

Sources (7)
Cite or embed this figure

Cite or embed this figure

The median published figure in the Incentive Pay Benchmark is 3.60 percent across 2 sources' own pages (range 3.40 to 3.80 percent), read 12 October 2026.

2 of the 7 named sources read in full publish a figure; 5 publish none, read 12 October 2026.

Incentive Pay Benchmark, country GB: median 3.80 percent across 1 source, read 12 October 2026.

Incentive Pay Benchmark, country CA: median 3.40 percent across 1 source, read 12 October 2026.

The median is unchanged since 26 September 2026 (was 3.60 percent across 2).

Cite as: "Orgplanly Incentive Pay Benchmark", updated 2026-10-19, https://orgplanly.com/datasets/incentive-pay-benchmark/.

Embed this figure (plain HTML, no scripts)

3.60 percent

median published figure, Incentive Pay Benchmark, across 2 sources, read 12 October 2026

Source: Orgplanly Incentive Pay Benchmark

Download the CSV (2 rows, computed 2026-10-19)

Keep this plan in Orgplanly ProDefend the number: start Pro